Beyond Accuracy: How Models of Decision Making Compare to Human Decision Making
نویسنده
چکیده
Decision aids are becoming more popular and more accessible thanks to the internet and hand held computers. The question remains, however, if decision aids can be used beyond just aiding the human decision process. Can we use computers to make decisions without loosing out on some of the aspects of decision making that are important to us? The aspects that will be dealt with are; transparency, consistency, accuracy, improvement, adaptability, and speed. In this master thesis I will present what these aspects mean to decisions, and how different models of decision making compare to human decision making with regard to them. For instance; how transparent and accurate are humans in their decision making compared to linear models, designed to fit the available data? I will also give some examples of decision aids and how they handle the features that define a good decision.
منابع مشابه
Extensions of ELECTRE-I and TOPSIS methods for group decision-making under complex Pythagorean fuzzy environment
Multi-criteria group decision-making is a process in which decision makers assess the performance of alternatives on the basis of conflicting criteria to opt the most worthy alternative as solution. TOPSIS and ELECTRE are effective and commonly used methods to solve multiple criteria decision-making problems. The aim of this study is to propose two new models, namely, complex Pythagorean fuzzy ...
متن کاملMaking good Decisions about Decision Making
Can you see that justice is supposed to be blind? Abstract Decision aids are becoming more popular and more accessible thanks to the internet and hand held computers. The question remains, however, if decision aids can be used beyond just aiding the human decision process. Can we use computers to make decisions without loosing out on some of the aspects of decision making that are important to ...
متن کاملProduct Development Decision Support System Customer-Based
Quality Function Deployment (QFD) has been traditionally used as a planning tool primarily for product development and quality improvement. In this context, many people have used QFD for making decisions on how to prioritize critical product areas from a customer perspective. However, it is the position of the author that the QFD process can be viewed as a decision support system that would enc...
متن کاملConvergence in a sequential two stages decision making process
We analyze a sequential decision making process, in which at each stepthe decision is made in two stages. In the rst stage a partially optimalaction is chosen, which allows the decision maker to learn how to improveit under the new environment. We show how inertia (cost of changing)may lead the process to converge to a routine where no further changesare made. We illustrate our scheme with some...
متن کاملComparison of Three Decision-Making Models in Differentiating Five Types of Heart Disease: A Case Study in Ghaem Sub-Specialty Hospital
Introduction: cardiovascular diseases are becoming the main cause of mortality and morbidity in most countries. This research goal was to predict the types of heart diseases for more accurate diagnosis by data mining and neural network technics. Method: This research was an applied-survey study and after data preprocessing, three approaches of neural network, decision making tree and Bayes simp...
متن کامل